For all of our latest information and announcements, please check the News and Resources tab at the top.

Behavioral Health in Montana – How Did We Get Here?


1970s: Montana began deinstitutionalizing the mentally ill and intellectually developmentally disabled (IDD). Before the 1970s, the mentally ill and DD adults and children were treated in institutions across Montana. Warm Springs treated the mentally ill; Boulder campus treated the IDD population, and children were sent to Galen.

Mid-1970s: Montana developed five Community Mental Health Centers and funded them to care for the mentally ill within the community:  Western MT Mental Health Center, Eastern Montana Community Mental Health Center (Miles City), South Central Community Mental Health Center (Billings) and Center for Mental Health (Great Falls – now Many Rivers Whole Health).  There was a fifth mental health center in Bozeman that closed and was absorbed by Western Montana Mental Health Center.

1980s to Present: The five centers were unable to handle all of the Medicaid patients in Montana, so other state-approved Medicaid providers opened in most of the major cities to treat patients. Some of these specialized in mental health, some in substance use disorder (SUD) and some in IDD services.

1997: In 1997, when the state adopted managed care to administer its mental health system, it tried to require private psychiatrists and therapists to be more accountable for the services they provided to poor patients. Instead of serving patients and then sending the state a bill, private providers were forced to get permission from the managed care company before treating the patient.[ii]

1999: Managed Care for Medicaid patients in Montana was ended by the Department of Public Health and Human Services in 1999 because so few providers were willing to take Medicaid patients.

2000 to Present: Montana returned to a fee-for-service (FFS) model which is currently only operated by five states across the U.S. In the FFS model, providers bill only for approved services and cannot bill for overhead services. At the same time, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are paid on a perspective payments system (PPS) that provides a larger bundled payment to cover the service and overhead, i.e., nursing care, case management, receptionist, pharmacy, etc.

For example, if you see a therapist at an FQHC (community health center like Riverstone), Medicaid will pay a PPS rate that covers all of the services that you receive and the cost of providing those services to you.

For Medicaid FFS providers will receive only the cost of the service they are providing, i.e., $92 for a 50-minute therapy appointment and nothing for the overhead of providing that care.

The Medicaid FFS rates have declined over the past 20 years and many providers have gone out of business unable to compete with hospitals or FQHCs.

For the past several decades, FQHCs have seen about 70% of the mentally ill and SUD patients. These patients have less severe illness and can be treated by their primary care doctor and a therapist. This is similar to having hypertension and having your primary care physician treat your hypertension. You will only need a referral to a specialist if your illness gets worse.

Thirty percent of the adults have a Serious Mental Illness (SMI). SMI is a small subset of the 300 mental illnesses listed in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). SMI includes disorders such as bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder.[iii]

Children with Severe Emotional Disturbance (SED) are persons who are under the age of 18, who have had a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder of sufficient duration to meet diagnostic criteria specified within DSM-V, that resulted in functional impairment which substantially interferes with or limits the child’s role or functioning in family, school or community activities.[iv]

SMI adults and SED children are primarily treated by the Medicaid state-approved agencies within Montana who are paid on the FFS system.

2017-2018: Shifting state revenues in 2017 and 2018 led to a series of budget changes in the 2019 biennium, due to action by both the Legislature and the governor. State agencies experienced cuts to their general fund budgets in the first year of the two-year budget period and planned for further cuts in the second year. However, agencies saw their funds restored in the second year of the biennium when the revenue situation improved. The budget cuts affected both the adult and children’s mental health systems during Fiscal Year 2018, which began on July 1, 2017, and ended on June 30, 2018.

When the budget for the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) was restored to its original appropriation for FY 2019, some but not all of the mental health cuts were reversed. FY 2019 began on July 1, 2018, and ended on June 30, 2019. The timeline below shows the key events behind the budget changes of that biennium.[v]

2020-2022: The COVID-19 worldwide pandemic came just as providers were beginning to negotiate new rates after the 2017-2018 budget cuts. Reimbursement for only a few services had successfully been increased, i.e., Targeted Case Management for Children, Intensive Outpatient for SUD, Home Support Services for children, etc.

As the pandemic caused a national shortage of providers, Medicaid providers lost even more clinicians who were able to work at a FQHC or hospital for considerably more money due to the higher reimbursement in the PPS model. At the same time, referrals for services increased dramatically due to the stressors brought about from the pandemic, i.e., lost jobs, skyrocketing housing and daycare costs, work and school from home requirements, anxiety created by the pandemic, and illness among kids and adults.

2021: In 2021, the Legislature appropriated $2.7M for a third-party, objective Medicaid rate study requested by the Governor and DPHHS. Guidehouse was hired for this rate study and over 9 months, providers provided detailed cost reports to Guidehouse to establish the costs of providing care by the Medicaid providers. Adult mental health, children’s mental health, substance use disorder, senior and long-term care providers, and developmentally disabled providers were studied in the first round. Benchmarks for these services were provided to the Legislature, Governor, and DPHHS in July 2022.[vi]

2023: The 2023 Legislature appropriated $330M to raise Medicaid rates for the studied providers to the benchmarks of costs provided by the rate study. The Governor signed this appropriation as part of HB2 and the rates will be finalized in September 2023 and will be paid retroactive to July 1, 2023. However, inflation continues to increase, and the benchmark rates continue to lose ground to inflation and will need to be recalculated in the near future







Mary Windecker

Executive Director BHAM

August 2023

2023 Montana Legislature

At the Behavioral Health Alliance of Montana, we’re helping all of our members work to create sustainable behavioral health in Montana. Both programming and funding have to be sustainable in order to serve the citizens of Montana. See below for updates on our platform priorities! You can also review specifics in our newsletter found under the News and Resources tab.


A second bite at the CCBHC apple, HB939, sponsored by Rep. Gillette, was also tabled by House Appropriations in a motion by Rep. Fitzpatrick (Anaconda). Fortunately, DPHHS and the Governor’s office received the $1M SAMHSA CCBHC Planning grant and will continue to work toward implementation in the 2025 session.

HB17 WAS TABLED BY HOUSE APPROPRIOATIONS. BHAM will continue to work to implement CCBHCs with DPHHS, the Governor’s office, NAMI MT, National Council on Mental Wellbeing, and other advocates of transforming the behavioral health system in Montana.

A Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic model is designed to ensure access to coordinated comprehensive behavioral health care. CCBHCs are required to serve anyone who requests care for mental health or substance use, regardless of their ability to pay, place of residence, or age – including developmentally appropriate care for children and youth.

CCBHCs must meet standards for the range of services they provide and they are required to get people into care quickly. An important feature of the CCBHC model is that it requires crisis services that are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. CCBHCs are required to provide a comprehensive array of behavioral health services so that people who need care are not caught trying to piece together the behavioral health support they need across multiple providers. In addition, CCBHCs must provide care coordination to help people navigate behavioral health care, physical health care, social services, and the other systems they are involved in.

DPHHS, National Council for Mental Wellbeing, BHAM, NAMI MT and others have been educating the legislators on the Health and Human Services Committee and the Part B Budget Committee on CCBHCs. Unfortunately, some of the legislators are still struggling with understanding the model.

In an attempt to boil it down as simply as possible, we’ve come up with this description:

The Certified Community Behavioral Health Centers (CCBHC) would begin the transformational change of the behavioral health system to a comprehensive value-based reimbursement system. That means that the siloed organizations that currently receive fee-for-service would be able to work together in a continuum of care and provide wrap-around services for seriously mentally ill adults and seriously emotionally disturbed children. This is the model that FQHCs and hospitals use so we’re just asking that behavioral health providers also be able to provide care this way.

CCBHC Downloads:

Download a PDF of Mary’s CCBHC presentation from the NAMI conference here.

Find out more here Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs) | SAMHSA

Download the CCBHC FAQ’s here.

Download Mary’s BHAM Criminal Legal Reform CCBHC Presentation here.

March 2023: HB2, the DPHHS budget bill, has moved into the Senate and includes about 94-95% of the provider rate study benchmarks for behavioral health. Caferro’s bill, HB649, that requested the full funding to benchmarks and an annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) for providers was amended to remove the COLA and only provide an additional $5M for provider rate increases. Physicians receive an annual Medicaid COLA by statute and behavioral health providers should receive the same to maintain parity required by law.

Feb. 16, 2023: JAS Appropriations Committee voted to implement additional rate increases for providers in all 3 sectors and also converted the $25M for one-time-only funding to the base for ongoing funding over the biennium. This brings most behavioral health programs closer to the cost of covering care, but there is still a gap with the benchmark reimbursement for many programs. Rep. Mary Caferro has introduced HB 649 that would raise rates to those recommended by the Governor’s Provider Rate Study to cover costs as identified in 2019 data. This will will be heard in Health and Human Services Committee on Feb. 24, 2023. See Talking Points below.

Jan. 3, 2023: The Governor’s proposed budget has come out and includes increases for the four sectors studied in the Medicaid Provider Rate Study: senior and long-term care, developmentally delayed, and adult and children’s mental health and substance use disorder treatment providers.

The comprehensive and objective Governor’s Medicaid rate study found that adult and children’s mental health and substance use treatment providers receive less than 85% on average of the cost of delivering that care. Obviously, a business can’t remain open if they are reimbursed less than their costs. That’s just basic Business 101.

During this legislative session, we’ll be talking with legislators about funding the full recommendations from the Governor’s study.

Advocacy Suggestions:

  • The Legislature needs to fund the full recommendations and an annual COLA for community-based behavioral health in your communities as requested in HB649.
  • We appreciate the JAS Appropriations Committee providing additional funding, but the rates remain below the basic cost of providing care and should be raised to the full recommended rates from the Governor’s rate study.
  • No business can survive being paid less than the cost of care and more homes, beds, and programs will need to be closed unless the full costs are covered.
  • My organization will need to lay off _____ FTEs and close ____ homes/programs/beds if the full cost of covering care is not covered by the Medicaid rates.
  • Advocate for an annual Medicaid cost-of-living increase for mental health and substance use providers similar to the one that physicians receive. Once we get the rates up to market, we want to make sure that another expensive rate study isn’t required in the future.
  • To learn more go to:

Toolkit: Don’t Deny Me

By law, most health plans must cover illnesses of the brain, such as depression or addiction, the same way they cover illnesses of the body, such as diabetes or cancer. Speak up about illegal denials of care! Navigate to our News and Resources page to download assets to help you spread the word.

Learn more at